Use a range, not a single bpm.
Most runners should treat Zone 2 as a controlled aerobic band, then cross-check with breathing, perceived effort, and long-run drift.
Compare 220-age, Tanaka, and custom max HR values, overlay Karvonen (HRR) results, and connect the output to 80/20 mileage planning. Consistent aerobic control keeps easy days easy—and makes the hard days count.
Most runners should treat Zone 2 as a controlled aerobic band, then cross-check with breathing, perceived effort, and long-run drift.
Resting heart rate helps tailor zones to your current fitness, while percent-max HR is simpler when RHR data is inconsistent.
If fatigue, injury, illness, or low-energy signs persist, keep easy runs easy and reduce load before chasing higher zones.
Enter age and resting HR to calculate Zone 1–5, MAF 180, and weekly 80/20 mileage recommendations.
Choose the modifier that best fits your health history and training consistency.
Maximum aerobic HR (MAF)
— bpm
Aim for MAF HR − 10 to MAF HR during easy aerobic runs.
Zone 2 (aerobic base)
— bpm
—
Calculated max HR
— bpm
| Zone | % of max/HRR | bpm range | Primary purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enter your age to view the table | |||
These answers match the structured FAQ data on this page.
Both methods are used. Percent max HR uses only max HR, while Karvonen uses max HR and resting HR for more personalized zones.
A common range is 60-70% of max HR, but this varies by athlete. Use your test data and perceived effort to refine it.
MAF is useful for conservative aerobic control, while Karvonen offers finer control when resting heart-rate data is reliable.
Last updated: February 25, 2026